UK AND European farmers
need the option of growing biotech crops if they are to meet the needs of a
larger, richer, urban world population, especially if climate change makes
increased yields an even greater challenge.
“By 2050 the World’s
population will have reached nine billion, 34% up on today,” Mark Buckingham
from Monsanto’s corporate affairs department told delegates at the Cambridge
Arable Technologies (CAT) winter conference. “So far the United Nation’s
predictions on population growth have been robust with predictions made in 1963
for the year 2000 proving very accurate.
“At the same time
farmers have a good record of meeting the increased need for food through the
use of breeding techniques. These began with pedigree breeding through to
hybridisation, high-throughput analytics, marker-assisted selection and now GM
crops.”
Accusing anti-biotech
groups of scare tactics, Mr Buckingham claimed there were excellent case
studies highlighting the benefits of using GM crops, such as dramatic
improvements in cotton production in India. Recent decisions to ban GM
crops in France and Germany were
political rather than scientifically based, he maintained.
Looking to the future,
new developments meant that biotech crops could have a valuable place in
sustainable crop production, he said. Monsanto was researching ways of
improving nitrogen use efficiency. As the production of nitrogen is the largest
single contributor to greenhouse gases in crop production, improving the plant’s
ability to use nitrogen could help reduce nitrogen requirement and thus cut
greenhouse gases, he proposed.
Other new research was
aimed at improving the drought tolerance of plants and increasing the
proportion of healthy omega oils in soya.
GM crops may be a
contentious issue, but research into the use of compost should please everyone.
However, as Richard Fenwick of CAT reported, life is seldom that simple.
In 2008 the organisation
won a contract awarded by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (Wrap) to
monitor the effects of using compost from three treatment plants on five farms
in the Eastern Region.
“Compared with other
forms of organic fertiliser, compost is readily available and has a good
nutrient profile,” Mr Fenwick said. “Little nitrogen is released from compost
in the first year, but it is a source of phosphate and potash in year one. It
is also an effective means of improving soil condition.”
The compost was used on
winter wheat and sugar beet in farm-scale trials. Under NVZ regulations a maximum
of 250 units/ha nitrogen can be applied in any one year, even though the
nitrogen in compost is released slowly over several years. This meant only
15t/ha of compost could be spread, despite the fact that the maximum quantity
of organic material is set at 30t/ha under NVZ regulations.
Surprisingly, despite a
pre-harvest analysis of yield potential which suggested higher yields in the
treated crops, this was not achieved. Ex-combine yields of treated and
untreated crops were similar, with no benefit detected in the winter wheat.
Nevertheless, Mr Fenwick
believed compost could be financially valuable.
“When phosphate and
potash are expensive, compost has a significant replacement value, even with an
average haulage and spreading cost of £8.50/t. For farmers close to a composter
the costs will obviously be lower and the value greater.”
Typically the yield
benefits of using compost might be expected in subsequent years when the
nitrogen is released and soil improvement could be measured. It would also be useful
to be able to measure the effects of using higher volumes per ha.
However this will not be
possible as financial constraints have meant funding has not been made
available by Wrap for an ongoing trial, as originally planned.
Arable farmers concerned
at the constraints on their budgets are wondering whether the addition of more
biofuel plants will reduce the relatively high stocks of grain and lift prices.
Michael Archer a senior
analyst at the Home Grown Cereals Authority was not convinced.
“We may have some
lessons to learn from the USA,”
he said. “It was assumed the increase in biofuel production from maize would
reduce the volumes available for export, but although export volumes decreased
slightly, production increased to compensate.”
In the UK, wheat
prices can be affected by US maize prices, he added. The UK wheat market may also become more regionalised
with increased production in the North of the country driven by the new biofuel
plants on Teeside, in Hull
and at Immingham.
The likely impact of
such plants is still uncertain, however, not least because of their location
near ports and the potential impact of the dried feed grain by-product which,
even if derived from imported grain, will come onto the UK market.